* US Fights Data Borders * America’s Diplomatic Push Against Data Control * US Orders Envoys to Challenge National Data Rules * Washington’s Stance on Global Data: Less Sovereignty * US Mobilizes Diplomats for Open Data Flow

Viktor Eriksson
2 Min Read

These measures are perceived as disruptive to artificial intelligence and cloud computing services, yet numerous nations are still considering their implementation.

Marco Rubio  United States Department of State public domain
                                        <div class="media-with-label__label">
                        Credit:                                                             United States Department of State                                                   </div>
                                </figure>
        </div>
                                        </div>
                        </div>
                    </div>

The United States government has directed its diplomatic corps to actively resist efforts by other nations to enact so-called data sovereignty legislation, which limits where and how non-domestic tech firms can store and process their citizens’ information, as reported by Reuters.

An internal memorandum issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio details the US perspective, characterizing these regulations as detrimental to unrestricted data movement, the advancement of AI, and cloud service operations. The Trump Administration contends that requiring data to be stored locally could elevate expenses, introduce cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and grant governments more authority over data.

Concurrently, the concept of data sovereignty is gaining traction, particularly across Europe, driven by apprehensions regarding privacy, surveillance practices, and the significant influence of the US in artificial intelligence and technology sectors. The document cites the EU’s GDPR as an instance of regulations that the United States views as overly stringent.

Diplomatic personnel are now charged with observing and shaping international proposals aimed at limiting cross-border data exchanges, alongside advocating for alternative structures that facilitate the unhindered transfer of data among nations.

Laws and RegulationsGovernmentMarketsIndustry
Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *