Apple expressed its gratitude for the constructive and ongoing discussions with UK authorities.
<div class="media-with-label__label">
Credit: <a href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">Apple</a>
</div>
</figure>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>Following scrutiny from UK regulators, both Apple and Google have consented to revise their app store operations within the UK. This development was officially announced by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Tuesday.
Under this new agreement, neither company will unfairly treat apps that directly compete with their own offerings. Both tech giants have committed to enhancing transparency in their app approval procedures and ensuring that third-party applications are not disadvantaged in App Store search results.
Furthermore, both firms have pledged not to exploit data gleaned from third-party apps for the exclusive benefit of their own products and services. Apple has also committed to streamlining the process for developers to request access to its platform features, such as NFC capabilities for payments or support for Live Translation in their applications. These pledges are designed to reassure app developers that they will encounter equitable treatment moving forward.
Apple’s Stance
In a statement issued to Computerworld, Apple declared: “Apple navigates intense competition across all markets where we operate, and we are dedicated to relentlessly innovating to deliver superior products, services, and user experiences. The commitments unveiled today empower Apple to continue advancing crucial privacy and security innovations for users, alongside fostering significant opportunities for developers. We value the positive and ongoing dialogue with UK officials.”
Sarah Cardell, the chief executive of the CMA, elaborated: “These represent vital initial steps as we persist in developing a broad spectrum of additional measures aimed at enhancing Apple and Google’s app store services in the UK. This includes, for instance, fostering greater choice and innovation in digital wallets, bolstering the UK’s fintech sector, and potentially supporting the implementation of digital IDs.”
Google commented that while it considers its existing developer practices to be inherently fair and transparent, “We embrace the chance to address the CMA’s concerns through collaborative efforts.”
These pledges arise following a ruling by the UK regulatory body to confer Strategic Market Status (SMS) upon both US corporations within the mobile market. This designation grants the CMA the authority to mandate alterations to their business models, promoting a more open competitive landscape. Nevertheless, the regulator also committed to pursuing negotiated settlements for enforcement, which is precisely what has transpired in this instance.
A Pragmatic Regulatory Philosophy, Not Dogmatic
The stark difference in the UK regulators’ approach to this issue is noteworthy. In contrast to their EU counterparts, the UK regulator engaged in extensive discussions to pragmatically achieve a better equilibrium that caters to the needs of markets, developers, customers, and Apple.
The CMA is still evaluating its stance on the fees Apple levies on developers for accessing its platforms, ecosystem, customer base, operating systems, developer tools, and App Stores.
This stands in sharp contrast to the considerably more rigid approach adopted by European regulators. Driven by what appears to be ideological overconfidence and a lack of technological understanding, they have assumed the power to impose platform design choices that were not requested, thereby introducing substantial privacy and security risks for Apple and its user base.
From this perspective, the UK’s strategy closely mirrors those employed by regulators in Japan under the Mobile Software Competition Act and in Brazil, aligning with the directives from the Administrative Council for Economic Defense. In all three scenarios, a more collaborative dialogue between Apple and regulatory bodies appears to have achieved a more effective balance regarding competitive requirements, simultaneously demonstrating the feasibility of a practical, measured regulatory framework.
In each of these three instances, it has been demonstrated that a regulatory approach capable of safeguarding the privacy, security, and safety of all stakeholders while maintaining competitive markets is indeed achievable. It is only in Europe where the regulatory outcomes seem almost entirely misaligned with the interests of all parties—save for Apple’s competitors.
Significance of the Changes
Unlike Europe, the CMA appears much more willing to acknowledge the profound economic significance of the app market for the overall UK economy, estimating its contribution at 1.5% of the UK’s GDP. Since the App Store’s inception in 2008, UK developers have collectively earned nearly £9 billion from the sale of digital goods and services, with Apple also supporting over 550,000 jobs across the UK.
While these agreements are currently voluntary, the CMA possesses the authority to enforce changes should Apple or Google fail to uphold their commitments. Concurrently, one could reasonably argue that Apple already adheres to many of these principles; it has consistently asserted that its app review process is fair and objective, and that its App Store search algorithms do not prioritize its own applications. The company will also maintain its commitment to data privacy, including the protection of data provided by developers for app review purposes. The primary significant alteration might involve granting developers broader access to its platforms for integration into their own products and services.
To ensure continued compliance, Apple intends to implement new mechanisms for monitoring the fulfillment of these commitments.
What Comes Next
The CMA is currently soliciting public feedback on these agreements with the major tech companies, with submissions due by March 3. It is anticipated that some competitors will leverage this feedback process to advocate for further concessions from Apple and Google. However, the CMA expects these new commitments to become effective on April 1, 2026, coinciding with Apple’s 50th anniversary.
While this event is unlikely to be a central theme in Apple CEO Tim Cook’s anniversary reflection message that day, it is intriguing to consider how the very existence and implementation of such regulations against the company highlight the immense journey Apple has undertaken since the Apple-1 was merely a nascent idea in the minds of Steves Wozniak and Jobs.
